The government says its flagship policy to cap care costs in England will be delayed until 2020

Pensioners betrayed as Care Costs Cap is now delayed until 2020. For many, this could mean the loss of the family home to pay for care, if they have not already placed their house in Trust.

Costs were to be limited to £72,000 for the over-65s and younger adults with disabilities from April 2016.

The Department of Health said it was still "firmly committed" to the cap, but questions are now being raised over whether the policy needs rethinking.

The move came after councils wrote to ministers asking for a delay because of the "enormous pressures" they faced.

For years councils have been warning that the care system - which covers residential care and help at home with tasks such as washing and dressing - has been underfunded. A shortfall of £4.3bn has been predicted by the end of the decade - nearly a third.

Concerns had also been expressed that the drive for a national living wage would push up costs.

The letter from the Local Government Association on 1 July said that while councils backed the introduction of the cap, it was not possible to cope with the extra demands the changes would bring at the moment.

It said the current system was "no longer sustainable" and pressing ahead would be "deeply damaging".

It had been predicted the changes would add £6bn to public sector spending over the course of five years.

The move was part of a raft of changes being introduced under the 2014 Care Act and included in the Conservative Party's manifesto.

Catastrophic costs

As well as capping costs, the changes would have provided a more generous system of state help.

Currently those with assets above £23,250 do not get any help from councils towards their costs.

That was to have risen to £118,000 under the changes.

Ministers had claimed the policy would stop people racking up "catastrophic" care costs in old age - one in 10 people who enter the care system end up forking out over £100,000.

In a written ministerial statement, the government said it was "firmly committed" to the plans, but it was clear following the letter from the LGA that the government needed to "think carefully".

"This is not a decision that has been taken lightly. Further announcements will follow in due course."

But Labour's shadow care minister Liz Kendall said: "This is a shameful broken promise from David Cameron, and devastating news for older people and their families who have been trying to plan for the future."

Councillor Izzi Seccombe, of the LGA, said: "In an ideal world, we would have funding for both the system and the reforms but we have to be realistic about where scarce resources are needed most.

"Any money from delaying the reforms must be put back into adult social care services and support putting it on a sustainable footing."

Age UK's Caroline Abrahams said the delay was the right decision as introducing the cap now would have been a "distraction" at a time when the care system was in a state of "cataclysmic" decline.

"What matters now is that the government grasps the scale of the galloping crisis and uses the spending review to bring forward effective solutions."

She said she hoped the delay would lead to a rethink as the cap had been set too high in the first place.

Prof Martin Green, Chief Executive of Care England, which represents care providers, said it was now time to come up with a "sustainable" solution "once and for all".

"If the government refuses to address the issue of funding, we will have a care system in crisis and the NHS unable to cope with the pressure," he added.